Thank you for the opportunity to clarify this time. Our very own research mission should be to make sure in the event the there are differences when considering pages and you will low-pages out-of dating software inside the mating orientations (short-identity and you will much time-term). „. In our study, no certain causality (personalityapps explore otherwise programs usepersonality) is supposed. With a cross-sectional structure, we cannot expose people. I’ve used the investigation we envision that’s top appropriate reaction to our lookup concern. On Abstract (p. dos, lines 31-33), for example, i wrote:
It had been found that, whereas matchmaking applications profiles had a top brief-identity mating positioning than just low-profiles (more regular behavior, higher desire, plus positive attitude), there have been no variations in the fresh new long-term positioning because a function of fool around with/non-have fun with.
Right here, as well as all through the brand new manuscript, i have showed the outcomes as detailed, maybe not having any certain presumption from explanations and you may outcomes.
The procedure point offers an excellent perception of your own test services. Brand new test out of students seem to diverge rather out of an over-all college student society pertaining to the ratio out-of non-heterosexual people. In the analysis nearly 1/step 3 of your pupils was classified as actually intimate fraction most popular hookup apps Waco. It is not discussed in the investigation limits (decreased representativeness).
Response: Thank you greatly for the comments and you may suggestion. The sample is indeed not the same as regarding studies accomplished various other geographical and cultural contexts, which have a high ratio away from users out-of intimate minorities. not, we’re being unsure of from the why this should be an indicator of lack of representativeness, regardless of if, needless to say, i together with try not to guarantee representativeness of our own sample. The fresh new sampling for this investigation try similar otherwise very similar to the fresh new testing out of prior degree in the same search classification (see Table lower than).
First, the studies are not just biased of the intimate positioning (highest probability of participation to own non-heterosexual someone), in addition to you to definitely bias continues to grow
An obvious development is located. The fresh ratio regarding low-heterosexual people try broadening within products. We could envision a few choices to establish so it. We cannot pick one officially probable factor for it. 2nd, about people regarding students (The country of spain, just one college or university), the current presence of non-heterosexuality try expanding. After that scientific studies are must clarify this aspect.
I’ve made an effort to get this clearer by modifying the new identity your manuscript, that is now „Perform younger dating application users and you can non-pages differ in mating orientations?
Concerning the so you can intimate orientation, a couple points should be indexed. Earliest, the higher proportion out of players off intimate minorities, over 29% of your final attempt. This could be regarded as too little representativeness in our decide to try. I think one a choice interpretation is achievable. This study shares that have earlier in the day studies a comparable testing approach and you can population (Foreign-language students with the exact same age range and you can on the exact same school). We will inform you committed of data range and proportion of sexual minority members: , fourteen.7% , , 8.6% . A clear trend is found. New proportion regarding intimate fraction members is actually steadily expanding in our samples. We could thought one or two options to explain this. We can’t select any technically plausible reasons because of it prospective change of bias around the go out. 2nd, in fact about people out of students (Spain, a single college) the presence of low-heterosexuality try growing. That it 2nd choice carry out signify the problem regarding representativeness are even more visible one to real. After that studies are needed to explain this time. In any case, within regression analyses we provided intimate orientation just like the covariate. On top of that, in order to facilitate the fresh analyses, we decided to group participants with the heterosexuals and you will low-heterosexuals, thus losing the fresh new subtleties connected with the fresh conclusion out of people in sexual minorities.