This information describes the introduction of the partnership Intimacy Directory (RCI), and therefore pulls into conceptualization regarding closeness because high interdependence anywhere between a couple man’s facts recommended from the Kelley ainsi que al. (1983). The present day „closest“ relationship of people (N = 241) drawn on scholar inhabitants served since reason for RCI innovation, with the nearest relationship receive to encompass multiple relationship versions, plus personal, pal, and family relationship. The organization and psychometric properties of about three RCI subscales (Volume, Diversity, Strength), its scoring, and their consolidation to create a complete directory out-of closeness is discussed. The latest RCI’s decide to try-retest reliability was stated together with organization mobilnà web korean cupid anywhere between RCI score and you may the new longevity of the relationship is actually discussed. RCI score having individuals‘ closest relationship are compared to people of not-romantic dating, to a subjective closeness list, and also to several methods away from relationship affect, in addition to Rubin’s (1973) Liking and Enjoying balances. Eventually, the ability of new RCI to help you expect relationships break up was contrasted to that of one’s Subjective Closeness List, a collection of one’s psychological tone of dating, in order to relationships longevity. It is concluded that the newest RCI and contains appropriate interior and you can try-retest reliability, sufficient discriminant and build legitimacy, and you can guaranteeing predictive validity, thus recommending so it constitutes a feasible manner of assessing dating intimacy.
Fingerprint
- Equipment and Offers Treatments Life Sciences one hundred%
Cite that it
- APA
- Practical
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Blogger
- BIBTEX
- RIS
N2 – This particular article describes the development of the relationship Intimacy Catalog (RCI), and therefore pulls towards conceptualization out-of intimacy while the large interdependence between a few mans points proposed of the Kelley mais aussi al. (1983). The modern „closest“ relationships of people (N = 241) taken about beginner population supported due to the fact reason behind RCI invention, into the closest relationships discovered to help you encompass several dating types, and personal, friend, and family unit members relationship. The growth and you may psychometric characteristics of about three RCI subscales (Frequency, Variety, Strength), its scoring, and their combination in order to create a total index off intimacy was revealed. The new RCI’s take to-retest reliability is advertised and also the association between RCI get and you will the new longevity of the partnership is talked about. RCI ratings for individuals‘ closest relationship are contrasted to the people out of not-personal dating, to help you a personal intimacy index, and several measures regarding relationships apply at, and additionally Rubin’s (1973) Preference and you will Loving bills. In the long run, the ability of the fresh RCI so you can anticipate relationships breakup was compared to that particular of Subjective Closeness Index, a collection of your mental tone of relationship, also to matchmaking durability. It’s figured the brand new RCI and it has acceptable internal and attempt-retest reliability, satisfactory discriminant and create legitimacy, and you can guaranteeing predictive legitimacy, thus indicating it comprises a viable a style of determining relationships intimacy.
Abdominal – This particular article makes reference to the development of the relationship Closeness Directory (RCI), hence brings toward conceptualization away from intimacy once the higher interdependence ranging from one or two man’s points suggested because of the Kelley et al. (1983). The current „closest“ relationships of individuals (Letter = 241) removed in the student society offered since the reason for RCI innovation, to the closest relationships found so you’re able to encompass multiple dating models, along with close, friend, and you may relatives relationship. The growth and psychometric properties of the three RCI subscales (Frequency, Diversity, Strength), the scoring, in addition to their consolidation to form an overall total list out-of intimacy try explained. The fresh RCI’s take to-retest reliability is actually stated and organization ranging from RCI score and new life of the relationship is discussed. RCI results having individuals‘ closest relationships was in comparison to the people out of not-romantic dating, in order to a personal closeness directory, in order to multiple measures out-of dating affect, together with Rubin’s (1973) Preference and you can Enjoying bills. Finally, the ability of brand new RCI so you can assume dating breakup is contrasted compared to that of your own Subjective Closeness List, an index of the mental build of your matchmaking, and relationship durability. It’s determined that the RCI and it has acceptable interior and test-retest precision, sufficient discriminant and build authenticity, and you will encouraging predictive validity, ergo suggesting so it comprises a viable technique of assessing dating intimacy.