RONULO Vs. People
FACTS: Rosa Catholic Parish Church out-of San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte. However, at the time of the relationships, the fresh supposed officiating priest, Fr. Mario Ragaza, would not solemnize the marriage abreast of understanding that the couple failed in order to secure a wedding permit. As a beneficial recourse, Joey, who was then putting on barong tagalong, and you can Claire, clad from inside the a wedding clothes, with their moms and dads, sponsors and you will traffic, went on toward Independent Chapel out of Filipino Christians, known as the Aglipayan Chapel. They expected brand new petitioner, an enthusiastic Aglipayan priest, to execute a ceremony to which the latter consented despite come told of the few they’d zero marriage certification.
The fresh petitioner waiting his choir and you can planned a bulk on couples for a passing fancy go out. The guy conducted the fresh service on exposure of your groom, the fresh bride to be, their mothers, the principal and supplementary sponsors together with rest of its desired subscribers.
The fresh prosecution’s witnesses, Joseph and you may Mary Anne Yere, affirmed into the events of your own ceremony. Joseph are new veil recruit when you find yourself Mary Anne are the fresh new wire sponsor regarding marriage. Mary Anne testified one she saw the fresh bride walk down the aisle. She plus noticed the happy couple change its marriage rings, hug one another, and you can sign a file. She heard brand new petitioner training the principal sponsors to signal the fresh relationship package. Afterwards, it decided to go to the reception, got food and you will got photographs. She spotted the latest petitioner around. She along with recognized the wedding invite supplied to the girl by Joey.
Fl Umadac, the mother from Joey, affirmed one she heard the couple state into the service one it capture one another because husband and wife. Mariano R. Nalupta Jr. in which she was given a certificate that no relationships licenses is approved on the partners.
The newest petitioner, while admitting he presented a service, denied one his act away from blessing the couple are tantamount so you can good solemnization of relationship just like the contemplated for legal reasons.
ISSUE: Obtained the brand new petitioner was guilty of violating Post 352 of Modified Penal Code (RPC) to possess presumably starting an illegal wedding party.
Months after the matrimony, she went to the brand new civil local civil registrar out-of San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte that have Atty
RATIO: Petitioner presented an illegal wedding service. New crime once the sent to inside the Artwork 352 of your own RPC is the performance of ily Password and this checks out:
(3) A marriage ceremony which will take set best hookup app Washington toward look of the brand new hiring functions before solemnizing manager in addition to their private report that they capture both since the couple in the visibility out of no less than two witnesses away from courtroom decades.
Ways. 6. Zero given form or religious rite with the solemnization of your marriage is necessary. They might be called for, but not, for the employing functions to look physically till the solemnizing administrator and declare on the exposure off not less than several witnesses away from judge decades that they need one another because the spouse and you may girlfriend. So it report might be within the matrimony certification and therefore shall become signed of the hiring events as well as their witnesses and you may attested by solemnizing officer.
This new Ultimate Legal said one what produced new petitioner’s work an effective marriage service and not only a mere true blessing try that if you find yourself there is no prescribed setting or spiritual rite, all of that is actually called for is “towards the hiring people to seem directly until the solemnizing officer and you may declare regarding the exposure from for around a couple of witnesses off legal age that they simply take one another while the husband and you will wife.”
As to what earliest demands, the fresh petitioner acknowledge that the parties appeared prior to your and that reality is actually testified so you can by witnesses. Toward next specifications, we find you to, contrary to the petitioner’s allegation, the fresh prosecution seems, from testimony away from witnesses, that hiring events personally proclaimed that they grab each other because wife and husband. For this reason, it is clear one to petitioner used a marriage ceremony and not only blessing.